Or at least not for Vanity Fair. They we’re expecting to sell a lot of issues when a (almost) nude Gisele Bundchen was fronting their cover in May 09. But it ended up being the cover that sold the least in 2 years. Vanity Fair sell about 340,000 single magazines every month but this issue sold only 280,000 which is a huge loss.
-
Archives
- May 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
-
Meta

If nude isn’t selling, then go for the “nude” look with flesh colored clothing!
chickdowntown.com has a great selection!
Vanity Fair is full of crap. People are losing their jobs and we’re in a recession and their whining about selling ONLY 280,000 copies.? Their greed knows no bound. Someone need to tell them we’re in a recession. Maybe if they didn’t try to get people to hate on her so much they would have sold more. It’s obvious they created that whole controversy with the baby to sell mags. I bet Gisele didn’t even realized she was being set up. They’re disgusting.